Tag: Jason
Post 22 – Trial – Stephanie Serda (part 6)
“But the choice to move $300,000 to an account that they couldn’t just go in at a whim?” Serda “Correct.” This concludes her first testimony. Continue reading…
Post 19 – Trial – Stephanie Serda (part 3)
The Wood County prosecutors had the records of Jason, Kristie, and Dawid along with a few others buying all the Visalus product. There will be more testimony on this. However, they charged him with stealing these reimbursements. The Wood County investigator Douglas Kinder lied about not being able to track the money. The bank records show the purchase of Visalus. The Visalus records show where the purchases came from. Continue reading…
Post 17 – Trial – Stephanie Serda (part 1)
Anita Serda, Board, Dr. Paat, Finances, Fundraising, Jason, Medical Account, Medical Clinic, PHCA, Stephanie SerdaIn the time Jason and Stephanie worked together, the PHCA only received a single $9,000 grant in one year. Stephanie backed the skills required to be the President of the Board of Directors. As stated in the Defense opening arguments, someone had to be blamed. It was Jason. Continue reading…
Post 16 – Trial – Day 1 Commentary
$238k, $4000, Anita Serda, Board, Chico Martinez, Festival, Finances, Fundraising, Jason, Jesse Spier, Kristie Koester, PHCA, Stephanie Serda, Steve Kramer, TheftSome facts you need to know are that the PHCA had less than a $100,000 annual budget not including the festival. $42,000 of that money alone was Stephanie Serda’s salary. Anita made over $4000 to plan the festival. The accusation of Jason stealing $238,000 over 4 months is insane in and of itself. The PHCA could not raise that in years. How would Anita not believe something was wrong if a quarter of a million just disappeared? Pay close attention to the meeting minutes. They show a lot. Continue reading…
Post 12 – Trial – Anita Serda (part 5)
The May 20, 2012 board meeting was the date Jason made a motion that the board ceases to pay any employees on June 7th unless by event to preserve expenses or until proper funds are raised to continue operating indefinitely. The board voted in favor. Continue reading…
Post 11 – Trial – Anita Serda (part 4)
According to the records, as of September 2012, the PHCA had a loss of $26,481.84. In that very same meeting, the meeting minutes state “Committees will be receiving 10%, for example, we receive a $100 donation each committee will receive 10% and the general fund will receive 60%. A. Beautification & Safety B. Education & Programming C. Medical clinic 1. We will help them as needed for supplies and so forth. D. Festival” Continue reading…
Post 9 – Trial – Anita Serda (part 2)
“He was voted in as treasurer of the organization.” Anderson “That was the position he held?” Serda “Correct.” Anderson “Was he reluctant to take that position?” Serda “Yes.” Anderson “But he took it?” Serda “Yes.” Continue reading…
Post 8 – Trial – Anita Serda (part 1)
Anita Serda, Board, Christopher Anderson, Dr. Paat, Jason, Medical Clinic, PHCA, Rent, Stephanie SerdaThe discussion began with the financial audit completed by Jason and with Dr. Paat using the facility 4 days a week, 2 for the clinic, and 2 for volleyball. It took a potential of nearly $500 of rental income. No one else was part of that idea. Continue reading…
Post 7 – Trial – Opening Statements
Anita Serda, Ashley Clifton, Attorney General, Board, Channa Beard, Engaging, Fundraising, Jason, Medical Account, Medical Clinic, PHCA, Prosecutor, RICO, Sixth District Court of Appeals, Stephanie Serda, Treasurer, VolunteeringExposing the requirements of Engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity Beard states Pg. 190 “There are many incidents that you’re going to hear of. And corrupt activity can be defined as theft and money laundering. Those are the two that we’re going to focus on for this trial.” Continue reading…
Post 5 – The Charges
$25k, $30k, $3k, Anita Serda, Ashley Clifton, Engaging, Jason, Medical Account, Money Laundering, Prosecutor, Real Estate, RICO, Sheriff’s Sale, Sixth District Court of Appeals, Stephanie Serda, TheftIf you have a lawyer, they are you! No matter how badly they screw the pooch, you are stuck with the consequences. In Jason’s case, his appeal attorney was clearly not aware of the requirements for the engaging charge. He only had ten days after the decision from the Appeals court to inform them of the law that required the reversal of the engaging charge; it did not happen. In January 2024 Jason became certified in paralegal studies and learned this law shortly thereafter. He filed a motion for review. Not only was it denied because the appeal was over… Continue reading…
